![]() But, really, it was only about $139 dollars LESS VS the 10700k barebones combo.Īnd 10700k being faster, so why not go for the 10700k? Happy with this build overall. Since all my co-workers to friends telling me that with AMD 3700x at least i would be saving "ALOT" of money. I had the option to "upgrade" to a 3800x or a 3700x system. Here is a good video between HIGH VS ULTRA gaming: Also normally you don't want to always game on ULTRA settings, especially when you have a high refresh rate gaming monitor. BUT, whatever settings i either put on medium or high, my 1440p monitor makes up for it in quality. You may notice that i don't put all my games graphic settings ALL on ULTRA. 1440p grand theft auto v plus#ago I have the same and also get 140 plus on ultrawide. one of my friends has one with his 2080 Super I haven't heard of any performance issues using AMD CPUs tbh 9 level 2 Additional-Lock-8345 7 mo. Overall, the Core i7-10700K is an average performer with its 8-cores and 16-threads in this benchmark.ġ0700k OC 5.3GHZ first two cores, rest of the cores 5.2ghz, EXCEPT, 5.1ghz on the very last coreĢ080 super Hybrid FTW3 EVGA, MEMORY: 950 CLOCK: 118Ī bit of a tough journey, because while i was building my new 10700k system, i was in the middle of moving into a new house.īut, everything ended up fine. I easily pump out 140+ fps on my 1440p Ultrawide on competitive settings using a 5600X and 6800 XT, a 5900X would be even better. Intel's Core i7-10700K notches a small win over the Core i7-9700K, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Ryzen 7 3800X. The Core i7-10700K's performance earns it the 9th place. The Core i7-9700K clearly shows how significantly the high-end Coffee Lake Refresh-based CPUs fall behind the Comet Lake models. That's a ~2% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Core i7-9700K tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Comet Lake-based successor. In this benchmark, the Core i7-10700K has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Core i7-9700K by 2%. The Core i7-10700K takes a comfortable 6.8% lead over the Ryzen 7 3800X. It is 0.5% lower than the Core i7-11700K while being 0% higher than the Ryzen 7 5700X. The Core i7-10700K sits between Core i7-11700K and Ryzen 7 5700X. Overall, the Core i5-12600K is a very good performer with its 10-cores and 16-threads in this benchmark. Intel's Core i5-12600K notches a small win over the Core i7-11700K, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Ryzen 7 5800X. ![]() The Core i5-12600K's performance earns it the 4th place. ![]() The Core i7-11700K clearly shows how significantly the high-end Rocket Lake-based CPUs fall behind the Alder Lake-S models. ![]() That's a ~4.4% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Core i7-11700K tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Alder Lake-S-based successor. In this benchmark, the Core i5-12600K has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Core i7-11700K by 4.4%. The Core i5-12600K takes a comfortable 2.4% lead over the Ryzen 7 5800X. It is 0% lower than the Core i7-12700K while being 0% higher than the Ryzen 7 5800X3D. The Core i5-12600K sits between Core i7-12700K and Ryzen 7 5800X3D. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |